Field Marshal Abud
Majour General Numeri
Field Marshal Bashir
•My poit of view –Abdelazim Gomaa
Rescue adopted the policy of breaking energy and drying barges that allow the flow of energy and unleash the enormous revolutionary potential in young people and pushed them to the immigrant and exile in the Sudan has not seen bleeding like
In the first part of this article, we talked about the intervention of the international community, again after the failure of politicians / leaders, Sudanese, and his preaching roadmap considers necessary for resolving the Sudanese crisis. And we said, no matter who prepared this map: the African Union, or prepared by the United States and adopted by the Union!. And likened the situation Puppet theater, theater of the absurd, and dwell on the move Chkhos its stage. We continue today, and we take the roles of a host of other characters:
Army: won the Sudanese army lion's share in governing the country during the period since independence until today, so that it became a saying that the army has nothing to do with politics, is some degree of error, because they do not reflect reality: General Ibrahim Abboud March politics and rule the country for six years in the name of the Sudanese army . Field Marshal deposed Nimeiri ruled the country for 16 years in the name of the Sudanese army and everyone, including Nimeiri himself, knows that the Socialist Union Party was just a faint image of cover colors. Marshal and gold bracelet to resolve conflict with people Nimeiri bias, in the name of the military, to the choice of the people and manage the transition period in the same institution. And Field Marshal al-Bashir seized power in the name of the armed forces, despite the planning and implementation of the National Islamic Front for the coup. As is known, the al-Bashir overthrew the historic leadership of the Islamic Front in conflict Mufaslh famous, but the resolve internal conflicts amid all the ruling party, the name of the military establishment. Given the years of political practice, which has the name of the army, since the dawn of independence, and until this moment, we find close to 46 years of total 56 years. It should be noted, that these four systems, continued to involve the army and other forces of order in all the details of political action in the country and to the people. So, has the military passive and immersed in the civil wars, in the suppression of demonstrations and protest, arrests, service of the decision of the ruling political, in addition to Anfalha and embroiled in snow-white and awe proud when he sided strongly to the option of the masses against the political decision to the Governor, during the October Revolution of 1964 and the uprising of April 1985. In summary, the Sudanese army and established a fixed relationship to politics. Hence, the subject of the article in the link, Aji our question: How will the 2046 decision in the form of the military relationship with Sudan to the international community, considering the army one of the main characters in our theater referred to? Historically, we can monitor some of the disparity in the relationship regimes that ruled the country in the name of the army with the international community. In the era of Sudan, Lieutenant General Abboud was a young nation on the verge of life, the idea of "walking side caution." Therefore, before providing the facilities to pass the American colonial schemes in Africa, compared to U.S. aid to enjoy. In the era of Nimeiri, the involvement of the ruling regime in the name of the army, involved fully in relation to suspicious with the United States of America, the stories are well known: the Falasha, the regional center for the CIA, after his visit to Sudan declares Bush in Washington that Nimeiri is our man in Sudan (our man in Sudan) .. etc.. In the era of Field Marshal al-Bashir, hit by the relationship with the international community schizophrenia, between the hostile rhetoric of violence, and response following soft, as if the first reaction is just a dirt track to the second. And considering that all the solutions put forward by the international community, starting with Bmhakos and Naivasha and even Map of the road the last adopted in the UN Security Council Resolution No. 2046, trying to offer solutions to issues of war and democratization in the country, and their details, these solutions will be reflected on the role of the military in Sudanese politics, and therefore in relation to the international community. The army and other forces of order the other, they are involved in dealing with the issues of war and democratization.
