Opnion of Dr. Lam Ackoul.

ENGLISH Lam Akol: Heglig part of Sudan recognized leaders of the movement themselves We must stop being a scapegoat, and that face our problems directly 04-16-2012 05:30 PM I found an article Jacob Akol, enjoyable, especially in explaining where to track Heglig (Bentiu), I do not know why blame the international community, which always was a friend of the People's Movement? The Heglig actually part of what today is called the Sudan, has been recognized by the leaders of the SPLM themselves as so eloquently put it in his article, you had expected them to be more royal than the king? This community was determined to believe only that the opinion of the popular movement is important in southern Sudan, the truth must be said is that the SPLM leadership that belong to the same concern he has more of an opportunity to correct the error, Riek Machar himself, who hails from the state of the unit where tracking Heglig led the SPLM delegation to the Hague International Arbitration, and he knows full well that given by the map of Abyei include Heglig, he and his team did not raise their finger to object, again when they were discussing the limits of 01.01.1956 with the North, Heglig were not included in the discussion by SPLM as part of South Sudan, were not among the five regions currently disputed between the parties, the international community was watching the talks closely and if he supported the popular movement is blind, how do you expect them to suddenly buy a weak argument? But if you want to say they do not use their minds, the international community as well understand that he at least until the Court of Arbitration was the Abyei part of the north, so therefore, any area included in the map of Abyei, which provided for the International Court of Arbitration become part of northern Sudan. I agree with the writer in his theory of the last about why accepted the Government of Southern Sudan court's ruling without asking for the inclusion of Heglig (Bentiu) in government?, This should be the only reason behind the acquiescence Riek Machar to defend the position of non-defense, the SPLM leadership to take responsibility in Bentiu on a plate give to Sudan and only then can the South be convinced that the intentions were genuine. Single question arises, Are the fighting in Heglig fact in order to return to South Sudan? If this is the case, why do not fight in the pit areas of copper and qualitatively Kanji ... etc that are still attached to the Sudan? If that is the case, Sudanese rebels who have confessed in the media that they are fighting in Heglig really fighting to reduce the area of their home to take Heglig outside? I can not believe even for a second that the Secretary-General of the United Nations Ban Ki-moon gave Kerr ultimatum to withdraw its forces outside the Heglig, is the only move his UN Security Council resolution which urged the State of the South to withdraw its forces outside the Heglig, and urged Sudan to stop throwing areas in southern Sudan, when South Sudan joined the United Nations in July last year she had read the UN Charter, which clearly identified that the UN Security Council is the guardian of world peace and security, why are Mstgrbun of the UN Security Council to exercise powers delegated to him by 190 countries including South Sudan? We must stop being a scapegoat, and that face our problems directly, we have said before and we will that South Sudan needs the consensus of all stakeholders especially the political parties, need it now more than ever, the popular movement alone can not provide the country, It is time to humble and begin to think that all of the nation, government and opposition. Thank you D. Lam Akol "We publish the text of the article, Dr. Lam Akol, head of the Popular Movement for Democratic Change, the State of South Sudan, a response from the d. L on another article for one of the characters on South Heglig" Newspaper public opinion